MATTER OF JAMES


112 N.J. 580 (1988)

548 A.2d 1125

IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES H. JAMES, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 14, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robyn M. Hill, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

Joseph J. Rodgers, argued the cause for respondent (Fineberg & Rodgers, attorneys).


PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding arose out of a 1984 audit of respondent's accounts pursuant to the Random Audit Program. Respondent is charged with nine counts of ethical violations, including failure to maintain required records, failure to safeguard client funds, failure to pay promptly funds to a client, gross negligence in accounting for client funds, and misappropriation.

The District XIV Ethics Committee (the Ethics Committee) returned a presentment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases