1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 38 Ohio
  5. 38 Ohio St. 3d 29 (1988)
 

STATE v. BEUKE

No. 86-642.

38 Ohio St. 3d 29 (1988)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BEUKE, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 20, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur M. Ney, Jr., prosecuting attorney, Leonard Kirschner, Robert P. Ruehlman and William E. Breyer, for appellee.

H. Fred Hoefle and Peter Outcalt, for appellant.

MOYER, C.J.

The defendant-appellant asserts various errors by the trial and appellate courts in twenty propositions of law. Many of these legal issues have been decided in prior cases and will be disposed of accordingly. State v. Poindexter (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 1, 520 N.E.2d 568, syllabus.

Beuke's first fourteen propositions of law allege errors occurring at the penalty phase of his trial. Propositions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases