1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 313 Md.
  5. 313 Md. 357 (1988)
 

UNNAMED ATTORNEY v. ATTORNEY GRIEV.

No. 92, September Term, 1986.

313 Md. 357 (1988)

545 A.2d 685

UNNAMED ATTORNEY v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

August 10, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael L. Baum, Los Angeles, Cal. (George G. Misko and Greta C. Van Susteren, on the brief, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Glenn M. Grossman, Asst. Bar Counsel (Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel, on the brief), Annapolis, for appellee.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, COLE, RODOWSKY, COUCH, McAULIFFE and ADKINS, JJ.

COLE, Judge.

In this appeal we shall examine the limits of the Attorney Grievance Commission's (AGC) subpoena power when investigating an attorney's targeted direct mail solicitation practices. Specifically, the unnamed attorney (appellant) asks us to quash the AGC's subpoena compelling him to testify and to produce for inspection, inter alia, "any and all financial journals and ledgers" connected with appellant's law practice.

We summarize the facts. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases