MUTSCH v. RIGI

No. C4-88-598.

430 N.W.2d 201 (1988)

Luzerne MUTSCH, Respondent, v. Iraj RIGI, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 11, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick A. Bohling, Daly, Bohling & O'Connor, Burnsville, for respondent.

Phillip R. Krass, Krass & Monroe Chartered, Shakopee, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by FOLEY, P.J., and NORTON and LESLIE, JJ.


OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding respondent Luzerne Mutsch money damages due pursuant to a promissory note. The trial court found that misrepresentation had not occurred when Mutsch had merely expressed an opinion and belief regarding the profit potential of a business. Appellant Iraj Rigi argues that the trial court's judgment was clearly erroneous.

FACTS

Mutsch purchased a restaurant called Chaucer's On...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases