PADILLA v. CONCORD PLASTICS, INC.


113 N.J. 508 (1988)

551 A.2d 534

JOSE RAFAEL PADILLA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CONCORD PLASTICS, INC., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 29, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George M. Boyd argued the cause for appellant (Albert W. Seaman, attorney).

Sheldon Schiffman argued the cause for respondent (Fred S. Brause, Jr., attorney).


PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 221 N.J.Super. 301 (1987).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN join in this opinion.

Opposed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases