1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 222 N.J.
  5. 222 N.J. Super. 378 (1988)
 

NORWOOD EASTHILL ASSOC. v. N.E. WATCH

222 N.J. Super. 378 (1988)

536 A.2d 1317

NORWOOD EASTHILL ASSOCIATES, A NEW JERSEY PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NORWOOD EASTHILL WATCH, CHRISTOPHER MARRARO, IAN MAITLAND AND YVONNE MAITLAND, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 2, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allan H. Klinger argued the cause for appellant (Klinger, Nicolette, Mavroudis & Honig, attorneys; Allan H. Klinger, of counsel; Carl J. DiPiazza and Gordon E.R. Troy, on the brief).

Michael L. Kingman argued the cause for respondents Christopher Marraro, Ian Maitland and Yvonne Maitland (Woodcock and Kingman, attorneys; Michael L. Kingman, on the brief).

No brief was filed on behalf of respondent Norwood Easthill Watch.

Before Judges MICHELS, SHEBELL and GAYNOR.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Norwood Easthill Associates, a partnership, appeals the dismissal on summary judgment of its complaint alleging malicious interference with agreements to which it was a party by defendants, Ian and Yvonne Maitland, Christopher Marraro and Norwood Easthill Watch (Watch). We affirm.

The contracts concern the sale and development of a 151.1-acre tract located in the Borough of Norwood and owned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases