ESERHUT v. HEISTER

No. 20331-2-I.

52 Wn. App. 515 (1988)

762 P.2d 6

LEN ESERHUT, Appellant, v. STEVE HEISTER, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

September 6, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Wotipka and Broihier & Wotipka, for appellant.

Norman W. Cohen, for respondents.


WEBSTER, J.

Leonard Eserhut appeals the trial court's decision that his former coemployees, Steve Heister, Tom Weist and Gary Venn (hereinafter coemployees), are not liable for the tort of intentional interference with a business relationship. The coemployees cross-appeal, contending that the trial court should have dismissed the action based on the exclusivity doctrine of the Industrial Insurance Act. Eserhut's former employer Utility Vault Company cross-appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases