RAMOS BY RAMOS v. RAMOS


227 N.J. Super. 336 (1988)

547 A.2d 342

MAGALI RAMOS, AN INFANT BY HER GUARDIAN AT LITEM, CEBERO RAMOS AND CEBERO RAMOS INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS, v. JOSE RAMOS AND EDELRA RAMOS, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Union County.

Decided June 7, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Hood for plaintiff (Hood & Abrams, attorneys).

Paul Spina for defendants (McDermott, McGee & Ruprecht, attorneys).


WECKER, J.S.C.

This Court has determined, on its own motion, to allow the parties relief under R. 4:50-1(f) from one aspect of the Final Judgment entered. In a "friendly" proceeding for approval of the settlement of an infant's claim, this Court denied approval of that portion of the proposed settlement that would have provided a contract for future payment of a lump sum at the infant's 18th birthday. The decision is reported in Ramos v. Ramos,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases