HESSEL v. HESSEL

Docket No. 99307.

168 Mich. App. 390 (1988)

424 N.W.2d 59

HESSEL v. HESSEL

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided May 2, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Potuznik, Spaniola, Wilson, Anderson & Nolan, P.C. (by Denis V. Potuznik), for plaintiff.

S.I. Rosenberg & Associates, P.C. (by S.I. Rosenberg), for defendant.

Before: J.B. SULLIVAN, P.J., and MacKENZIE and G. SCHNELZ, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Defendant husband appeals as of right from the parties' judgment of divorce and an order of the trial court denying his motion to assess costs. This case presents a question of first impression: whether MCR 2.405, governing offers to stipulate to entry of judgment, applies to proposed property settlements. We hold that it does not and affirm.

The parties were married in 1952. This was the third marriage for both. No children were born of the marriage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases