1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 43 Ohio
  5. 43 Ohio Misc. 2d 10 (1988)
 

DILTZ v. FORD-NEW HOLLAND, INC.

No. 87-CI-196.

43 Ohio Misc. 2d 10 (1988)

DILTZ ET AL. v. FORD-NEW HOLLAND, INC.

Court of Common Pleas of Pickaway County.

Decided March 14, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles W. Hess, for plaintiffs.

Vincent, J. Lodico, for Sperry-New Holland and Ford-New Holland, Inc.

James E. Phillips, for Lear Siegler, Inc.

AMMER, J.

The second amended complaint filed in this case names Lear Siegler, Inc. as a defendant. The basis of this case is that the plaintiff purchased, from defendant Ford-New Holland, Inc., a field cultivator which was manufactured by a division of Lear Siegler, Inc. It appears that on May 10, 1985, the plaintiff removed a latch on one of the vertical portions of the cultivator in order to lower it after the hydraulic lowering mechanism had failed, and that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases