1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 159 Ariz.
  5. 159 Ariz. 331 (1988)
 

JACKSON v. PIMA COUNTY

No. 2 CA-CV 88-0261.

159 Ariz. 331 (1988)

767 P.2d 54

Gail S. JACKSON, individually; Max J. Gottschalk, individually and dba Max's Enterprises, ME, Godesca, Imagineering, and/or Gottschalk Engineering; and Fred Frye, individually and dba Fred Frye, Stables and/or Fred Frye Boarding and Training, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. PIMA COUNTY, a body politic, Defendant/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

December 22, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Haralson, Kinerk & Morey, P.C. by W. Daniel Shelton, Tucson, for plaintiffs/appellants.

Murphy, Clausen & Goering, P.C. by Michael F. McNamara, Tucson, for defendant/appellee.

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Chief Judge.

The only issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court correctly applied the one-year statute of limitations, A.R.S. § 12-541(3), to bar the claim of Gail S. Jackson, Max J. Gottschalk and Fred Frye (Jacksons) against Pima County for negligence and negligence per se. We affirm.

FACTS

Jacksons own property adjacent to the Rillito River and to property owned by Edison Realty Associates. In 1979, Edison...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases