MATTER OF RULES ADOPTION REGARDING INMATE-THERAPIST CONF.


224 N.J. Super. 252 (1988)

540 A.2d 212

IN THE MATTER OF RULES ADOPTION REGARDING INMATE-THERAPIST CONFIDENTIALITY [N.J.A.C. 10A:16-4.4].

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 4, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Catherine A. Hanssens, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Alfred A. Slocum, Public Advocate/Defender of New Jersey, attorney; Catherine A. Hanssens, of counsel and on the brief).

Stephen P. Tasy and Vicki A. Mangiaracina, Deputy Attorneys General, argued the cause for respondents (W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Michael R. Clancy, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel; Stephen P. Tasy and Vicki A. Mangiaracina, on the brief).

Lowenstein, Sandler, Kohl, Fisher & Boylan, attorneys for amicus curiae New Jersey Psychological Association (Gregory B. Reilly, of counsel; Gregory B. Reilly and Rochelle B. Galiber, on the brief).

Before Judges O'BRIEN, HAVEY and STERN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by O'BRIEN, J.A.D.

The Office of Inmate Advocacy, as authorized by N.J.S.A. 52:27E-1 et seq., appeals from a portion of regulations adopted by the Department of Corrections (DOC) concerning psychological services provided for prison inmates.1 In response to our decision in Zeltner v. N.J.Dept. of Corrections,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases