1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 157 Ariz.
  5. 157 Ariz. 265 (1988)
 

BOYCE v. CITY OF SCOTTSDALE

No. 1 CA-CIV 9471.

157 Ariz. 265 (1988)

756 P.2d 934

Barbara BOYCE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; Board of Adjustment of the City of Scottsdale; and Ann Arthur, Joyce Hall, Matt Ringer, Lloyd H. Robertson, William Crawford, Norval Tyler, David Van Ness, as members of and constituting the Board of Adjustment of the City of Scottsdale, Respondents-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

May 19, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sacks, Tierney & Kasen by Leslie A. McCarthy, David L. Keily, Paul G. Johnson, Phoenix, for petitioner-appellant.

Richard Filler, Acting Scottsdale City Atty. by Fredda J. Bisman, Asst. City Atty., Scottsdale, for respondents-appellees.

OPINION

ALAN MATHESON, Judge Pro Tem.

The sole issue considered in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in concluding it had no jurisdiction to review rulings of Scottsdale's Board of Adjustment.

Appellant Barbara Boyce (Boyce) is the owner of a single-family residence located at 7248 East Wilshire in Scottsdale, Arizona. The property is zoned R1-7, which requires a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet pursuant to the Scottsdale City Ordinance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases