1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 229 N.J.
  5. 229 N.J. Super. 187 (1988)
 

STATE v. DANNEMILLER

229 N.J. Super. 187 (1988)

550 A.2d 1303

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT DANNEMILLER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 19, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Don X. Bancroft argued the cause for the appellant (Don X. Bancroft, on the brief).

Joseph Connor, Jr., Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for the respondent (Lee S. Trumbull, Morris County Prosecutor, attorney; Joseph Connor, Jr., on the letter brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA and SHEBELL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, J.A.D.

Defendant Robert Dannemiller appeals the de novo determination of the Law Division which found him guilty of operating a motor vehicle while his blood-alcohol level exceeded 0.10%. N.J.S.A. 39:4-50(a). The sanctions and penalties imposed by the Harding Township Municipal Court in which defendant had originally been convicted and sentenced were affirmed. Defendant's sanctions have been stayed pending...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases