1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 229 N.J.
  5. 229 N.J. Super. 171 (1988)
 

STATE v. PORTNEY

229 N.J. Super. 171 (1988)

550 A.2d 1295

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STUART PORTNEY AND PENNLEN ASSOCIATES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 12, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert C. Williams argued the cause for appellants (Robert C. Williams and Willard E. Byer, Jr., of counsel and on the letter brief).

Jeffrey A. Gerson argued the cause for respondent (Laura M. LeWinn, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER and O'BRIEN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by O'BRIEN, J.A.D.

Defendants appeal from their convictions for violating a municipal ordinance of the Township of West Orange requiring a permit for the removal of trees. We reverse as to defendant Stuart Portney (Portney). We affirm the conviction of defendant Pennlen Associates (Pennlen), but reduce the penalty within the limit permitted by N.J.S.A. 40:49-5.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases