1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 109 N.J.
  5. 109 N.J. 258 (1988)
 

SOTOMAYOR v. VASQUEZ

109 N.J. 258 (1988)

536 A.2d 746

LOUIS SOTOMAYOR, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, AND CHRISTIAN CARVAJAL, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, CECILIA FLORES, AND CECILIA FLORES, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS, v. FERNANDO VASQUEZ, JOSE MARIN, JULIO FREIJO, AND THE CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY, AND/OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS, AND UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND THE AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 26, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victor C. Harwood, III, argued the cause for appellant (Harwood Lloyd, attorneys).

Mark I. Feiner argued the cause for respondent Louis Sotomayor (Greenberg, Feiner, Wallerstein & Benisch, attorneys).

Frank P. Addas argued the cause for respondent Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (James & Addas, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by O'HERN, J.

This is a PIP case. PIP is an acronym for personal injury protection benefits, a form of compulsory auto insurance required by the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, L. 1972, c. 70 ("No-Fault" Law), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. This case concerns the scope of the coverage afforded under a standard New Jersey automobile policy. We do not intend this opinion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases