1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 225 N.J.
  5. 225 N.J. Super. 135 (1988)
 

STATE v. LEVINSON

225 N.J. Super. 135 (1988)

541 A.2d 1110

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. v. DAVID J. LEVINSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 19, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur H. Miller argued the cause for appellant (Miller & Littman, attorneys; Arthur H. Miller, on the brief).

Simon Louis Rosenbach, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Alan A. Rockoff, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney; Simon Louis Rosenbach, on the brief).

Herbert I. Olarsch filed a brief amicus curiae on behalf of the New Jersey Turnpike Authority (Mary-Elizabeth Garrity, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, GAULKIN and D'ANNUNZIO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by D'ANNUNZIO, J.A.D.

The issue is the validity of a regulation banning photography on the New Jersey Turnpike. Defendant's municipal court conviction for taking photographs on the New Jersey Turnpike was upheld in the Law Division. Defendant appeals, and we now reverse.

Defendant, a Virginia resident, was traveling on the New Jersey Turnpike with his wife on August 8...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases