1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 158 Ariz.
  5. 158 Ariz. 164 (1988)
 

DRYDEN v. BELL

No. 2 CA-CV 87-0088.

158 Ariz. 164 (1988)

761 P.2d 1068

Robert M. DRYDEN and Lauralee Dryden, husband and wife, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Samuel BELL and Mita Bell, husband and wife; Dale Naegle, an unmarried man, Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

Reconsideration Denied March 22, 1988.

Petitions and Cross-Petitions for Review Denied October 4, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Feulner & Cornelio, P.C. by George J. Feulner and Carmine Carnelio, Tucson, for plaintiffs/appellants.

Molloy, Jones & Donahue, P.C. by Gary F. Howard, Phoenix, for defendants/appellees Bell.

Minnette Burges, Tucson, for defendant/appellee Naegle.

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Chief Judge.

Robert M. Dryden and Lauralee Dryden, husband and wife, appeal from a jury verdict and award in the amount of $8,591.00 against Samuel Bell and Mita Bell, and from a defense verdict in favor of Dale Naegle, arising from the design, construction and sale of 34 acres of land with improvements. Drydens brought an action against Bells for breach of contract, misrepresentation, breach of express and implied warranties, conversion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases