1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 111 Wn.2d
  5. 111 Wn.2d 174 (1988)
 

MEANEY v. DODD

No. 53891-3.

111 Wn.2d 174 (1988)

759 P.2d 455

PAUL MEANEY, ET AL, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLES H. DODD, ET AL, Respondents, SKAGIT COUNTY, Petitioner.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 15, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Rickert, Prosecuting Attorney, and John R. Moffat, Chief Civil Deputy; William C. Smart and Keller Rohrback, for petitioner.

Wm. H. Nielsen, for respondents.

Patrick D. Sutherland, Prosecuting Attorney for Thurston County, and Thomas R. Bjorgen, Deputy, on behalf of Washington Association of Counties, Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, and Thurston County, amici curiae for petitioner.

CALLOW, J.

Skagit County challenges reversal of a summary judgment order in its favor dismissing a cross claim brought by Charles and Connie Dodd. The Dodds allege the County was negligent in issuing them a special use permit and in failing to provide accurate information during the application process. The trial court found the County breached no duty owed to the Dodds. The Court of Appeals reversed. Meaney v. Dodd, 47 Wn.App. 386

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases