1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 225 N.J.
  5. 225 N.J. Super. 49 (1988)
 

GRAVES v. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.

225 N.J. Super. 49 (1988)

541 A.2d 725

WILLIAM GRAVES AND JOYCE A. GRAVES, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CHURCH & DWIGHT COMPANY, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 18, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adrian I. Karp argued the cause for appellants (Adrian I. Karp and Kenneth M. Trombly, attorneys; Messrs. Karp and Trombly, on the brief).

Richard Galex argued the cause for respondent (Garruto, Galex and Cantor, attorneys; Richard Galex, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, BILDER and SKILLMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

This is a personal injury products liability case in which the trial judge, following a hearing held pursuant to Lopez v. Swyer, 62 N.J. 267 (1973), concluded that plaintiff William Graves was not entitled to the benefit of the so-called discovery rule of accrual. He consequently granted the motion of defendant Church...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases