SEREMBUS v. COMFORT LINES, INC.

No. 87 C 5355.

689 F.Supp. 1499 (1988)

John H. SEREMBUS, etc., Plaintiff, v. COMFORT LINES, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

April 6, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen I. Engelhardt, Jacobs, Burns, Sugarman & Orlove, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Ira Gould and James W. Marks, Holled & Coff, Chicago, Ill., for defendants 1735 Diversey, Inc.


ON MOTION TO FREEZE ASSETS

MORAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., and now moves the court to freeze the assets of defendant 1735 Diversey, Inc. ("Diversey") during its pendency, pursuant to Rule 64 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff argues that attachment is necessary because Diversey, as the alleged alter ego of now defunct Comfort...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases