LLOYD CORPORATION v. WHIFFEN

A8512-08127; CA A38839.

750 P.2d 1157 (1988)

89 Or.App. 629

LLOYD CORPORATION, Ltd., a California Corporation, Respondent, v. Lucinda WHIFFEN, Hale Lee Weitzman, Eric Stachon, and John Doe 1-100, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 24, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jan Peter Londahl, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Bennett, Birmingham, Londahl & McCandlish, P.C., Portland.

Duane A. Bosworth and Milton C. Lankton, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Duane A. Bosworth and Ragen, Roberts, Tremaine, Krieger, Schmeer, O'Scannlain & Neill, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


NEWMAN, Judge.

Defendants appeal a judgment granting plaintiff declaratory relief and a final injunction which barred defendants from entering plaintiff's shopping center, known as Lloyd Center, "to exercise their expressions of opinion or to gather signatures in the initiative and referendum process without plaintiff's permission or consent." We reverse for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

These facts are undisputed.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases