1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 201 Cal.App.3d
  5. 201 Cal.App.3d 1458 (1988)
 

HAZEL v. HEWLETT

Docket No. B029329.

201 Cal.App.3d 1458 (1988)

247 Cal. Rptr. 723

REX F. HAZEL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EDMOND HEWLETT, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

June 10, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Tuohey & Prasse, Conrad G. Tuohey and Bonnie Gail Birnbaum for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Rigg & Dean, Marilyn Bonetati and Thomas G. Wianecki for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

LILLIE, P.J.

In this dental malpractice action plaintiff, Rex Hazel, appeals from judgment entered in favor of defendant Edmond Hewlett, D.D.S., and against plaintiff after the trial court sustained defendant's affirmative defense of the statute of limitations.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In June 1983 plaintiff went to the offices of Carl Stasiewicz, D.D.S., for dental treatment. Dr. Stasiewicz determined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases