1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 688 F.Supp.
  5. 688 F.Supp. 961 (1988)
 

B.V.D. LICENSING CORP. v. MARO HOSIERY CORP.

No. 88 Civ. 2459 (RWS).

688 F.Supp. 961 (1988)

The B.V.D. LICENSING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MARO HOSIERY CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 23, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nims, Howes, Collision & Isner, New York City (Oliver P. Howes, Jr., William R. Hansen, and Joyce M. Russell, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Summit Rovins & Feldesman, New York City (John L. Amabile, and Kathryn J. Fritz, of counsel), for defendant.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant Maro Hosiery Corporation ("Maro") has moved for an order pursuant to 9 U.S.C. §§ 3, 4 (1982) compelling plaintiff The B.V.D. Licensing Corporation ("B.V.D.") to proceed to arbitration and staying this action pending a final determination of that arbitration proceeding. Upon the findings and conclusions set forth below, the motion is granted.

Background

B.V.D. is a Delaware company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases