BULGO v. MUNOZ

Nos. 87-2297, 87-2646.

853 F.2d 710 (1988)

Joseph BULGO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank MUNOZ, also known as Frank Munoz Martin, individually; Land & Construction Company, Inc., a Hawaii corporation; Paine Webber, Inc., formerly Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.; Alex Lau, an individual, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 2, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John H. Boone, San Francisco, Cal., James M. Dombroski, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard R. Clifton, Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, Paul A. Lynch, Case & Lynch, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellees.

Before BROWNING, SNEED, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.


SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Joseph Bulgo's second amended complaint set forth six claims of misconduct pertaining to a securities transaction against Frank Munoz (Munoz), Land and Construction Co. (L & C), PaineWebber, Inc. (PaineWebber) and Alex Lau (Lau). Numerous rulings were made by the district court and certain special verdicts were returned by the jury. The result is that Bulgo's claims were rejected for various reasons and by different means. We affirm in all...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases