1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 755 P.2d
  5. 755 P.2d 744 (1988)
 

VAN OSDOL v. KNAPPTON CORP.

A8401-00492; CA A41879.

755 P.2d 744 (1988)

91 Or.App. 499

James VAN OSDOL, Appellant, v. KNAPPTON CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Respondent, and Joseph L. Eubanks, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 15, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond L. Conboy, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Jan Thomas Baisch and Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & Conboy, Portland.

John R. Faust, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

ROSSMAN, Judge.

This action is before us for the second time. In the previous appeal, 73 Or.App. 684, 699 P.2d 1176 (1985), Knappton Corporation (Knappton) had been granted a summary judgment on the ground that respondeat superior did not apply and, therefore, that it was not liable for the negligence of its employe, Eubanks. We reversed. On remand, the trial court denied plaintiff's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases