1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 686 F.Supp.
  5. 686 F.Supp. 720 (1988)
 

HILL v. SEARLE LABORATORIES

No. B-C-86-119.

686 F.Supp. 720 (1988)

Connie HILL and William Hill, Plaintiffs, v. SEARLE LABORATORIES, A DIVISION OF SEARLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., G.D. Searle & Company; Searle & Company; John Doe I and John Doe II, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Batesville Division.

As Amended August 8, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Hodges, Little Rock, Ark., for plaintiffs.

Elizabeth J. Robben, Friday, Eldredge & Clark, Little Rock, Ark., for defendants.

ORDER

ROY, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants G.D. Searle & Company and Searle & Company. The plaintiff has responded, and the matter is now ripe for determination.

Plaintiff, Connie Hill, initiated this action alleging that defendant, Searle Laboratories, the manufacturer and supplier of a copper intrauterine device (IUD) called a CU-7 had manufactured/supplied a product which was unreasonably...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases