1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 694 F.Supp.
  5. 694 F.Supp. 651 (1988)
 

YOUNG v. CUTTER BIOLOGICAL

No. CIV 86-1318 PHX RCB (MM).

694 F.Supp. 651 (1988)

Donald Eugene YOUNG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CUTTER BIOLOGICAL, A DIVISION OF SCRIPT MILES LABORATORIES, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

August 3, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. St. George, St. George & Reed, Tempe, Ariz., for plaintiffs.

Thomas P. Prose, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, Ariz., for State defendants.

William R. Hayden, Tibor Nagy, Jr., Snell & Wilmer, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants Cutter, Gray and Estenson.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BROOMFIELD, District Judge.

On July 11, 1988, the court heard oral argument on a series of dispositive motions filed by the parties. Pursuant to the order of the court, these motions are deemed directed at all plaintiffs now consolidated in the present lawsuit.1 After a careful review of the parties' papers, and after conducting oral argument on the pending motions, the court now rules.

FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases