KAECHELE v. KAECHELE

No. 87-42.

35 Ohio St. 3d 93 (1988)

KAECHELE, APPELLEE, v. KAECHELE, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 10, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Luper, Wolinetz, Sheriff & Neidenthal, Barry H. Wolinetz and Mark S. Miller, for appellee.

Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Earl F. Morris, Thomas R. Sant, Stebelton, Aranda & Snider and Gerald L. Stebelton, for appellant.


HERBERT R. BROWN, J.

This appeal presents two related issues: (1) whether the trial court abused its discretion in making a sustenance alimony award which does not place the parties in complete parity, and (2) whether the failure of the trial court to specifically mention the Brown-McNeely bonus in its alimony award constitutes an abuse of discretion.

"`The term "abuse of discretion" connotes more than an error of law or judgment; it implies that the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases