1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 677 F.Supp.
  5. 677 F.Supp. 564 (1988)
 

HORWITZ v. ALLOY AUTOMOTIVE CO.

No. 84 C 10909.

677 F.Supp. 564 (1988)

Donald A. HORWITZ and Wesco Products Company, Plaintiffs, v. ALLOY AUTOMOTIVE COMPANY, Sheldon Gray, and Avrum Gray, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

January 26, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Douglas Weingarten, Forrest L. Ingram, J. Barton Kalish & Colleagues, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

William P. Caputo, Samuel J. Betar, F. John McGinnis, Altheimer & Gray, Myron M. Cherry, Peter Flynn, Cherry & Flynn, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

This matter concerns defendants' motion to strike plaintiffs' jury demand. For the reasons stated herein, defendants' motion is denied.

I. FACTS

Plaintiffs instituted this action against defendants on December 24, 1984. Before defendants attempted to answer, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on April 12, 1985 setting forth claims under the following theories: RICO, antitrust, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases