1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 710 F.Supp.
  5. 710 F.Supp. 524 (1988)
 

MAIDA v. ANDROS

Civ. A. No. 86-2675.

710 F.Supp. 524 (1988)

Hannah MAIDA and Santo Maida, Plaintiffs, v. James ANDROS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

December 13, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald G. Rubin, Voorhees, N.J., for plaintiffs.

Thomas B. Reynolds, Absecon, N.J., for defendants.

Marc L. Hurvitz, Atlantic City, N.J., for Adamar of N.J.

Michael A. Pirolli, Bridgeton, N.J., for Classic Coach.

OPINION

GERRY, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiffs Hannah and Santo Maida have filed a complaint in the District of New Jersey seeking redress under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985(2) and (3), 1986, 1988 and the First, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution as well as several state claims sounding in tort. The defendant, James Andros, was sued individually and in his capacity as an officer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases