1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 696 F.Supp.
  5. 696 F.Supp. 327 (1988)
 

U.S. v. SANDERS

No. 88 CR 104.

696 F.Supp. 327 (1988)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Thompson B. SANDERS, Daniel Dewey, David Lee Pelleu and Daniel Kolton, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

August 17, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dan Webb, Winston & Strawn, Steven Senderowitz, Chicago, Ill., for Thompson B. Sanders.

Michael Pasano, Zuckerman Spaeder Taylor & Evans, Coral Gables, Fla., for Daniel Dewey.

Luis Galvan, Asst. Federal Defender, Chicago, Ill., for David Lee Pelleu.

Michael Sher, Chicago, Ill., for Daniel Kolton.

James Conway, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for U.S.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Currently before the Court is defendant Thompson B. Sanders' motion to dismiss the superceding indictment. For the reasons noted below, that motion is denied.

I.1

Sanders first challenges the wire fraud counts as insufficient under McNally v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 107 S.Ct. 2875, 97 L.Ed.2d 292 (1987), for failure to allege a victim of the wire...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases