1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 676 F.Supp.
  5. 676 F.Supp. 189 (1987)
 

DURKEE v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO.

No. 87-C-5-S.

676 F.Supp. 189 (1987)

Stuart DURKEE and Mark Becker, individually and as partners d/b/a Cedar Car Care, Plaintiffs, v. The GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, and Mathisen Tire, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.

May 22, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward R. Brunner, Brunner & Sykes, Rice Lake, Wis., for plaintiffs.

William M. Conley, Foley & Lardner, Madison, Wis., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHABAZ, District Judge.

Before the Court is the motion of defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber for summary judgment on each count of the plaintiffs' three count complaint arising from the contractual relationship between the parties. By order dated February 16, 1987, the Court determined that the complaint stated no claim for relief (nor was there any possible claim that could be made) against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases