1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 656 F.Supp.
  5. 656 F.Supp. 209 (1987)
 

BUCKHORN, INC. v. ROPAK CORP.

No. C-2-86-1489.

656 F.Supp. 209 (1987)

BUCKHORN, INC., Plaintiff, v. ROPAK CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, E.D.

February 11, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Russell A. Kelm, Daniel R. Swetnam, Schwartz, Kelm, Warren & Rubenstein, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiff.

David Cupps, James H. Gross, Gerald P. Ferguson, John C. Vorys, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Algenon L. Marbley, Columbus, Ohio, William M. Curtis, Curtis & Vaccaro, Newport Beach, Cal., Henry Lesser, Dean J. Kitchens, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KINNEARY, District Judge.

Defendants Ropak Corporation and Ropak Holdings Corporation come before the Court seeking a preliminary injunction of certain actions taken by plaintiff Buckhorn, Inc. ("Buckhorn") and its board of directors in response to Ropak's tender offer for any and all shares of Buckhorn stock. More specifically, the defendants seek to enjoin various measures adopted by the directors including: 1) amendments to the chief...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases