CLAYBOURNE v. IMSLAND

No. C3-87-1151.

414 N.W.2d 449 (1987)

Stephen CLAYBOURNE, et al., Appellants, v. Si IMSLAND, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 27, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank Claybourne, Doherty, Rumble & Butler, St. Paul, for appellants.

Chester D. Swenson, Gunderson, Swenson & Zander, Albert Lea, for respondents.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and RANDALL and STONE, JJ.


OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal of a judgment and its amendment under the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Appellants argue an injunction permitting limited use of a deceptive trade name is an abuse of discretion by the trial court. Appellants seek a permanent and total ban of any use of the deceptive name and allege that any other remedy denies them the relief to which they are entitled under facts as found by the trial court and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases