1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 667 F.Supp.
  5. 667 F.Supp. 191 (1987)
 

U.S. v. Di GILIO

Crim. No. 86-340.

667 F.Supp. 191 (1987)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. John Di GILIO, John Barbato, Donald Carson, Anthony Gallagher, Anthony Sharkey, Milton Held, David Richman, Harold Friedman, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

September 9, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel A. Alito, U.S. Atty. by Melvin S. Kracov, Executive Asst. U.S. Atty. and Jeffrey A. Bronster, Sp. Atty. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Organized Crime Strike Force, Newark, N.J., for plaintiff.

Larry Bronson, Bayonne, N.J., for defendant John Di Gilio.

Donald F. Manno, Cherry Hill, N.J., for defendant John Barbato.

Fisher and Ely by Ivan S. Fisher, New York City and Miller, Hochman & Meyerson by John R. Schwartz, Jersey City, N.J., for defendant Donald Carson; Frank W. Dunham, Jr., Arlington, Va., and Professor G. Robert Blakey, Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Ind., of counsel.

Anthony Gallagher, pro se, Bayonne, N.J.

John C. Whipple, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Newark, N.J., for defendant Anthony Gallagher.

Dennis M. Barlow, Nutley, N.J., for defendant Anthony Sharkey.

Ruhnke & Barrett by Jean DeSales Barrett, West Orange, N.J., and Carl J. Herman, Livingston, N.J., for defendant Milton Held.

Grand & Ostrow, Norman S. Ostrow, New York City, for defendant David Richman.

Lewis & Fiore, David L. Lewis, New York City, for defendant Harold Friedman.

DEBEVOISE, District Judge.

Count 1 of this 14-count indictment charges that all eight of the defendants engaged in a RICO conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 1962(d). Defendants moved to dismiss Count 1 on the grounds that (i) it fails to allege that the offense occurred within the statute of limitations period, (ii) it fails to allege a RICO enterprise and (iii) it fails to allege a pattern of racketeering activity. In addition, defendants contend that,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases