1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 480 U.S.
  5. 480 U.S. 370 (1987)
 

STRINGFELLOW v. CONCERNED NEIGHBORS IN ACTION

No. 85-184.

480 U.S. 370 (1987)

107 S.Ct. 1177

94 L.Ed.2d 389

STRINGFELLOW ET AL. v. CONCERNED NEIGHBORS IN ACTION ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 9, 1987

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Mulliken argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Robert P. Dahlquist, Barry P. Goode, Vincent Fish, Michael A. Kahn, Peter R. Taft, and G. Richard Doty.

Paul J. Larkin, Jr., argued the cause for the United States as respondent under this Court's Rule 19.6, in support of petitioners. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Habicht, Deputy Solicitor General Wallace, and Anne S. Almy.

Joel R. Reynolds argued the cause for respondents. With him on the briefs were Fredric D. Woocher and Carlyle W. Hall, Jr.

JUSTICE POWELL delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question before us is whether a district court order granting permissive intervention but denying intervention as or right is immediately appealable.

I

This case is part of the ongoing litigation concerning the Stringfellow Acid Pits, an abandoned hazardous waste disposal site near Glen Avon, California. Petitioners are 28 individuals, companies, or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases