1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 664 F.Supp.
  5. 664 F.Supp. 178 (1987)
 

LaPOLLO BY LaPOLLO v. GENERAL ELEC. CO.

Civ. A. No. 85-4824.

664 F.Supp. 178 (1987)

Charles J. LaPOLLO, by his father and Guardian ad litem, Charles P. LaPOLLO, Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Ponderosa, Inc., Hobart Manufacturing Company, John Does I-V, John Doe Corporations I-V, John Doe Joint Venture, and Roe Non-Profit Corporations I-II, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

July 15, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip L. Faccenda, Audubon, N.J., for plaintiffs.

Garrigle, Chierici, Palm & Wright by William A. Garrigle, Cherry Hill, N.J., for defendant Hobart Mfg. Co., Inc.

Montano, Summers, Mullen, Manuel & Owens by Mark R. Sander, Westmont, N.J., for defendant Ponderosa, Inc.

Parker, McCay and Criscuolo, P.A. by David A. Parker, Marlton, N.J., for defendant General Elec. Co.

OPINION

COHEN, Senior District Judge:

Presently before the court in this diversity suit for personal injuries by plaintiff, Charles J. LaPollo, is a motion by defendant Hobart Manufacturing Company, Inc. ("Hobart") for summary judgment. For the following reasons, Hobart's motion shall be granted in part and denied in part.

On June 3, 1985, plaintiff, a restaurant employee at defendant Ponderosa, Inc. ("Ponderosa"), suffered burns and other injuries...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases