1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 676 F.Supp.
  5. 676 F.Supp. 99 (1987)
 

VEITZ v. UNISYS CORP.

Civ. A. No. 87-24-N.

676 F.Supp. 99 (1987)

Joseph M. VEITZ, Jr., Plaintiff, v. UNISYS CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division.

November 17, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph R. Mayes, Samuel W. Meekins, Jr., Wolcott, Rivers, Wheary, Basnight & Kelly, P.C., Virginia Beach, Va., for plaintiff.

A.W. VanderMeer, Jr., Kelly O. Stokes, Hunton & Williams, Norfolk, Va., Paul M. Thompson, Hunton & Williams, Richmond, Va., for defendant.

ORDER

DOUMAR, District Judge.

This matter concerns Count Three of the plaintiff's complaint, in which the plaintiff alleges he has rights to benefits under Saudi Arabian law for overtime work he performed in Saudi Arabia. For reasons set forth below, this Court DENIES defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count Three of Plaintiff's Complaint or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment, as well as plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment and for Summary Judgment. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases