1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 676 F.Supp.
  5. 676 F.Supp. 92 (1987)
 

MEAD v. NATIONAL R.R. PASSENGER CORP.

Civ. No. Y-86-717.

676 F.Supp. 92 (1987)

Richard MEAD v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION t/a Amtrak v. HOLLAND COMPANY.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

May 26, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving Schwartzman, and Roger J. Greezicki, Balto., Md., for plaintiff.

Joseph P. Gill, Mark J. Daneker, and Michael W. Prokipik, Balto., Md., for defendant.

Jonathan E. Claiborne, Harry S. Johnson, and Warren N. Weaver, Balto., Md., for third-party defendant Holland Co.

MEMORANDUM

JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.

Richard Mead, injured during the course of his employment with the National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"), sued Amtrak under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. Amtrak subsequently impleaded the Holland Company as a third-party defendant. Following a jury trial of Mead's claim against Amtrak, Amtrak's third-party claim against Holland was tried to the Court while...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases