1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 659 F.Supp.
  5. 659 F.Supp. 100 (1987)
 

NEWCOME v. ESREY

Civ. A. 86-0013-H.

659 F.Supp. 100 (1987)

Vaughan S. NEWCOME, Plaintiff, v. A. Jack ESREY, and Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Harrisonburg Division.

April 7, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George W.R. Glass, Scully, Throckmorton & Glass, Winchester, Va., for plaintiff.

Phillip C. Stone, Gregory T. St. Ours, Wharton, Aldhizer & Weaver, Harrisonburg, Va., Arthur L. Smith, Washington, D.C., Peper, Martin, Jensen, Maichal & Hetlag, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MICHAEL, District Judge.

This is a securities fraud action brought under § 17(a) and § 22 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77q(a), 77v, (1982), § 10(b) and § 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78aa, and Securities Exchange Commission Rule 15 CL-7, 17 C.F.R. 240.15 CL-7. The plaintiff has also brought state law claims under Virginia Code §§ 13.1-502...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases