1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 155 Ariz.
  5. 155 Ariz. 582 (1987)
 

CITY OF TUCSON v. ESTATE OF DeCONCINI

No. 2 CA-CV 87-0105.

155 Ariz. 582 (1987)

748 P.2d 1206

CITY OF TUCSON, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ESTATE OF Evo DeCONCINI, Ora DeConcini, a widow; Peter V. Gallo, as Trustee, Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

Reconsideration Denied November 2, 1987.

Review Denied February 17, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick S. Dean, Tucson City Atty. by Tobin Rosen, Tucson, for plaintiff/appellant.

DeConcini McDonald Brammer Yetwin Lacy & Zimmerman, P.C. by Douglas G. Zimmerman and Diane M. Miller, Phoenix, for defendants/appellees.

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

The City of Tucson appeals from the judgment and denial of its motion for new trial in an eminent domain case, contending the award of compensation was excessive because the trial court erred in admitting and considering evidence of future profits from contemplated improvements. We find no error and affirm.

Appellees, the Estate of Evo DeConcini, Ora DeConcini and Peter Gallo as trustee, are the owners of a parcel of property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases