1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 654 F.Supp.
  5. 654 F.Supp. 71 (1987)
 

HAMMERMAN v. PEACOCK

Civ. A. No. 84-2724.

654 F.Supp. 71 (1987)

Robert HAMMERMAN, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, v. Thomas A. PEACOCK, Defendant and Counterclaimant, v. SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS UPHAM & COMPANY, INC., Additional Defendant on Counterclaim.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 29, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris Kletzkin, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff and counterdefendant.

Robert L. Cope, Washington, D.C., for defendant and counterclaimant.

James H. Schropp, Washington, D.C., for additional defendant on counterclaim.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NORMA HOLLOWAY JOHNSON, District Judge.

Counterdefendants in this case, the brokerage firm of Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Company, Inc. (Smith Barney), and Robert Hammerman, a former Smith Barney accounts executive, have moved for summary judgment with respect to the federal securities law claims asserted against them by counterclaimant Thomas A. Peacock, an individual investor whose claims arise out of a dispute over the manner in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases