1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 191 Cal.App.3d
  5. 191 Cal.App.3d 449 (1987)
 

HARRIS v. TIME, INC.

Docket No. A033361.

191 Cal.App.3d 449 (1987)

MARK HARRIS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. TIME, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

April 27, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Armando M. Menocal III and Sidney M. Wolinsky for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

James T. Fousekis, James F. Brelsford, Mark Herrmann and Steinhart & Falconer for Defendant and Respondent.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.‡]

OPINION

KING, J.

In this action where plaintiffs suffered no damage or loss other than having been enticed by the external wording of a piece of bulk rate mail to open the envelope, believing that doing so would result in the receipt of a free plastic calculator watch, we hold that the maxim "the law disregards trifles" applies and dismissal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases