1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 215 N.J.
  5. 215 N.J. Super. 388 (1987)
 

GAUTAM v. DE LUCA

215 N.J. Super. 388 (1987)

521 A.2d 1343

URMILA GAUTAM AND NARINDER GAUTAM, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. SAMUEL R. DE LUCA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND DOMINICK P. CONTE, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 2, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nino F. Falcone, attorney for appellant Samuel R. De Luca (Donald R. Venezia and Nino F. Falcone, on the brief).

Marinari & Farkas, attorneys for respondents Urmila and Narinder Gautam (Robert A. Farkas, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, BAIME and ASHBEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, J.A.D.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division, awarding both plaintiffs compensatory and punitive damages based upon the alleged legal malpractice of defendant Samuel De Luca and his associate Dominick Conte. The predicate for plaintiffs' claim was that their former attorneys had negligently represented them in a prior medical malpractice case resulting in the dismissal of their complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases