1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 216 N.J.
  5. 216 N.J. Super. 313 (1987)
 

G.M.A.C. v. JANKOWITZ

216 N.J. Super. 313 (1987)

523 A.2d 695

GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STANLEY JANKOWITZ, DEFENDANT-THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. POTAMKIN CADILLAC CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 1, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith & Fenmore, attorneys for appellant Jankowitz (Arthur T. Smith, Jr., on the brief).

Zavesky, Kelly & Madden, attorneys for respondent Potamkin Cadillac Corp. (Joseph E. Zavesky, on the brief).

Psak & Parker, attorneys for respondent General Motors Acceptance Corporation (John R. Parker, on the brief).

Before Judges KING and DEIGHAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DEIGHAN, J.A.D.

On this appeal we are required to determine whether, under the facts of this case, the purchaser of a new automobile may revoke acceptance for defects in the electrical system when the seller, after several unsuccessful attempts to cure the defects, was, according to the buyer, unable to do so. If the acceptance was properly revoked, the measure and sufficiency...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases