1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 153 Ariz.
  5. 153 Ariz. 344 (1987)
 

RIPPS v. CITY OF TUCSON

No. 2 CA-CV 5979.

153 Ariz. 344 (1987)

736 P.2d 827

George R. RIPPS and Paula E. Ripps, joint tenants, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF TUCSON, a municipal corporation, Defendant/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

April 14, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Winston & Strawn by Frank S. Bangs, Jr. and Megan E. Miller, Tucson, for plaintiffs/appellants.

Frederick S. Dean, City Atty. by Norbert W. Ludwig, Tucson, for defendant/appellee.

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Judge.

The sole issue on appeal is the reconciliation of A.R.S. §§ 9-462.01(E) and 462.04(G)1. We hold that A.R.S. § 9-462.04(G) governs the validity and effectiveness of all zoning ordinances where the required number of protests are lodged by adjacent property owners, and we therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court in favor of the City of Tucson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases