1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 215 N.J.
  5. 215 N.J. Super. 240 (1987)
 

ROLAND v. BRUNSWICK CORP.

215 N.J. Super. 240 (1987)

521 A.2d 892

ROBERT L. ROLAND AND GAYLE ROLAND, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, A CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND EILEEN CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND ARTHUR CONKLIN, JR., JANE ROE, A FICTITIOUS DESIGNATION, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, AND JOHN DOE, A FICTITIOUS DESIGNATION, REAL NAME UNKNOWN, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 20, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geibel & Geibel, attorneys for appellants (Philip L. Geibel, on the brief).

Messineo & Messineo, attorneys for respondents (Anne C. Skau, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, BAIME and ASHBEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

The meritorious issue posed by this appeal arises out of the manner in which the trial court responded to inconsistent answers by the jury to the special interrogatories submitted to it in this personal injury action. We conclude that the nature of the judicial response to that inconsistency impermissibly interfered with the jury's performance of its function.

The action arose out of a bowling alley...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases