QUAIN v. BUZZETTA CONSTR CORP


69 N.Y.2d 376 (1987)

Rose Quain et al., Respondents, v. Buzzetta Construction Corp., Appellant, and City of New York, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided April 2, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin J. Kelly and William F. Larkin for appellant.

Peter L. Zimroth, Corporation Counsel (Fred Kolikoff and Larry Sonnenshein of counsel), for City of New York, respondent.

Lewis Rosenberg, Alexander J. Wulwick and Marianne M. Acito for Rose Quain and others, respondents.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur in Per Curiam opinion; Judge ALEXANDER taking no part.


Per Curiam.

Although a grant of leave to appeal to this court ordinarily brings every reviewable issue before the court we hold that under rule 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), if a party in its application for leave to appeal specifically limits the issues it seeks to have reviewed, it is bound by such limitation and may not raise additional issues on the appeal. Here, because of the express...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases