1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Commw.
  4. 103 Pa.Commw.
  5. 103 Pa.Commw. 303 (1987)
 

RHOADS ET UX. v. LANCASTER PARK. AUTH. ET AL.

No. 32 T.D. 1985.

103 Pa.Commw. 303 (1987)

520 A.2d 122

Daniel Rhoads and Mary Rhoads, Appellants v. Lancaster Parking Authority and City of Lancaster, Appellees.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

January 22, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William P. Murphy, with him, James E. Beasley and Scott A. Bennett, Beasley, Hewson, Casey, Colleran, Erbstein & Thistle, for appellants.

Allan C. Molotsky, with him, Albert J. Schell, Jr., Post & Schell, P.C., for appellees.

Argued September 11, 1986, before Judges DOYLE and BARRY, and Senior Judge KALISH, sitting as a panel of three.

OPINION BY JUDGE DOYLE, January 22, 1987:

This is an appeal by Daniel Rhoads and Mary Rhoads from two orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County granting summary judgment to Appellees, Lancaster Parking Authority and the City of Lancaster. We affirm.

In late 1966 and early 1967, the Lancaster Parking Authority (Authority) was organized pursuant to the Parking Authority Law.1 The Authority owns the Prince Street Parking...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases